Typical GenAI Project
Single prompt engineered in a notebook
Quantum Infoway
We design and ship generative AI features that earn their place in real products — LLM copilots, RAG search, multimodal experiences, and agentic workflows. Built with evaluation pipelines, cost controls, and human-in-the-loop guardrails, so the AI keeps performing after launch.
We design and ship generative AI features that earn their place in real products — LLM copilots, RAG search, multimodal experiences, and agentic workflows. Built with evaluation pipelines, cost controls, and human-in-the-loop guardrails, so the AI keeps performing after launch.
Single prompt engineered in a notebook
Versioned prompts in source control
Production chatbots, support copilots, and embedded assistants. Memory, tool use, retrieval, and graceful fallback architecture — built for daily use, not demo screenshots.
Document ingestion, chunking, embeddings, vector indexing (Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector), and reranking. Production-grade retrieval that scales beyond the proof of concept.
Fine-tune open-source models (Llama 4, Mistral, Qwen) for cost reduction, domain adaptation, or IP control. Closed-model fine-tuning where supported.
Vision-language (GPT-5, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 2.5), text-to-image (Imagen, FLUX, Stable Diffusion), and speech (Whisper, ElevenLabs). Combined for richer product experiences.
Fill in the form or schedule a meeting to map out a path to success.
Most generative AI projects look impressive in the demo and fall apart in production. We've built a delivery model that closes that gap — evaluations, guardrails, and operational maturity from day one.
A generative AI development company designs, builds, and operates LLM powered software for other businesses. That covers scoping the use case, choosing and integrating foundation models, building RAG pipelines over your data, fine tuning where it pays, wiring guardrails and evaluation harnesses, and running the system in production with cost and quality monitoring. The difference between a generative AI development company and a general software agency is the production discipline around models. Prompts change behavior the way code does, model versions shift under you, and output quality has to be measured continuously rather than assumed.
At our published estimate ranges, an AI pilot or MVP costs $15,000 to $50,000 and ships in 4 to 10 weeks. A production system with an evaluation harness, guardrails, and 3 to 5 integrations costs $50,000 to $150,000 over 2 to 6 months. Enterprise and multi agent platforms run $150,000 to $300,000 and up. Plan for running costs of 15 to 25% of the build cost per year to cover tokens, vector databases, hosting, and monitoring. The model is rarely the cost driver. Data preparation, integrations, and evaluation infrastructure consume most of the budget. The AI development cost guide has the full breakdown with a calculator.
Start with prompt engineering, add RAG when answers must be grounded in your own data, and fine tune only when behavior, format, or cost targets cannot be met any other way. RAG fits most business use cases because your data changes daily and retraining is not practical. Fine tuning fits stable domains with strong data volume, and it can cut inference costs by letting a smaller model do the work. Production systems usually combine approaches, and agents add tool use on top. Our guides on RAG vs fine tuning and fine tuning vs prompt engineering walk through the decision in detail.
Judge production evidence, not demo quality. IDC and Lenovo research found 88% of AI proofs of concept never reach widescale deployment, so the differentiator is a partner who has taken systems past the pilot stage. Five checks that separate production teams from demo teams.
Fill in the form or schedule a meeting to map out a path to success.
Talk to an Expert